Assalam-o-Alaikum,

Ladies and gentleman, I would like to welcome you all to the weekly briefing.

Pakistan continues to believe that constructive partnerships and sincere dialogue are essential to advancing peace, security, and shared prosperity for all. We remain firmly committed to the principles of diplomacy, respect for sovereignty, and meaningful international engagement as the pathway toward regional stability and global harmony.

ENGAGEMNETS OF THE PRIME MINISTER

Over the last week our worthy Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif engaged with his counterparts from Qatar and Azerbaijan in telephonic conversations.

Views were exchanged on the evolving regional situation and ongoing peace efforts by Pakistan to advance regional peace and stability through dialogue and diplomacy.

PM conveyed his best wishes to the Azerbaijan’s President for the upcoming World Urban Forum. 

Ladies & Gentlemen,

Key engagements of the Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar:

UN Secretary-General’s Personal Envoy for the Middle East Conflict, Jean Arnault, called on Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar.

Mr. Arnault conveyed the UN Secretary-General’s deep appreciation for Pakistan’s diplomatic efforts aimed at promoting regional peace and stability, while reaffirming the United Nations’ continued support in that regard.

The DPM/FM discussed the latest regional developments and highlighted Pakistan’s ongoing engagement with all relevant parties to advance dialogue and de-escalation. He also expressed profound gratitude to the UN Secretary-General for his consistent support and valuable contributions toward Pakistan over the years.

DPM/FM has remained actively engaged with his counterparts in line with our efforts to promote peace and pursue diplomatic channels.

On May 8, Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar held separate conversations with Singaporean Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi regarding the welfare and repatriation of Pakistani and Iranian seafarers aboard vessels seized by U.S. authorities near Singaporean waters.

The two telephone calls also included exchange on regional developments and bilateral relations. 

On May 11, DPM/FM Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar held a telephonic conversation with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud to discuss the evolving regional situation and matters of mutual interest.

The Saudi Foreign Minister appreciated Pakistan’s constructive diplomatic role and expressed support for Islamabad’s efforts to promote regional peace and stability, particularly amid ongoing engagement between Iran and the United States. Both leaders also underscored the importance of safeguarding maritime security, including in the Strait of Hormuz, and agreed to maintain close coordination on regional and international developments.

On May 12, Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar held a telephone conversation with Austrian Foreign Minister Beate Meinl-Reisinger to exchange views on the evolving regional situation.

The Austrian Foreign Minister appreciated Pakistan’s constructive diplomatic role, particularly its efforts to facilitate dialogue between Iran and the United States in support of regional peace and stability.

The DPM/FM reaffirmed Pakistan’s commitment to sustained diplomatic engagement and continued facilitation of dialogue aimed at promoting peace and stability in the region and beyond. Both sides agreed to remain in close contact.

On the same day, Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar spoke with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to discuss recent regional developments, including Pakistan’s efforts to facilitate Iran–U.S. engagement for peace and stability.

Both sides reaffirmed support for continued diplomacy, emphasized the importance of a durable ceasefire and safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz, and reviewed upcoming high-level exchanges marking 75 years of Pakistan–China relations.

As media coverage of this telephone conversation, some reports suggested that Chinese side urged us to enhance the mediation efforts – implying as if Pakistan was being asked to “do more”. News coverage by some local newspapers conveyed the same impression. I wish to place on record that such reports somewhat misrepresent the call, both in letter and in spirit. The conversation was held with traditional warmth and cordiality. Foreign Minister Wang Yi appreciated Pakistan’s constructive mediation role and expressed full support for its efforts. Pakistan is thankful of the support by China in this regard. 

You must have also seen our Press Release on CBS Report on Iranian Aircraft in Pakistan

Pakistan categorically rejected the CBS News report regarding the presence of Iranian aircraft at Nur Khan Airbase, describing it as misleading, speculative, and disconnected from the factual context. 

The aircraft in question arrived during the ceasefire period to support diplomatic engagements linked to the Islamabad Talks, including the movement of diplomatic personnel, security teams, and administrative staff, and bear no connection to any military contingency or preservation arrangement. 

Pakistan reaffirmed its role as a constructive and transparent facilitator for dialogue and de-escalation, while remaining committed to regional peace, stability, and continued diplomatic engagement.

Following a saddening and disturbing terrorist attack on Police Post in Bannu, the Afghan Cd’A was summoned to the MoFA to deliver a strong demarche.

Pakistan strongly condemned the cowardly terrorist attack on the Fateh Khel Police Post in Bannu on 9 May 2026, which resulted in the martyrdom of 15 police personnel and injuries to several others. 

Preliminary investigations, supported by technical intelligence and evidence, indicate that the attack was orchestrated by terrorists operating from Afghan soil. 

In our demarche, we had urged the Afghan authorities to take immediate, concrete, and verifiable action against terrorist groups including Fitna-al-Khawarij, Fitna-al-Hindustan, and ISKP/Daesh. 

Pakistan reaffirmed its unwavering commitment to safeguarding national security and vowed to decisively eliminate all terrorist networks, facilitators, and enablers threatening the country’s peace and stability.

Thank you.

***
(Nayyer Ali, 365 News):    My question is regarding Iqbal Afridi, who is an MNA from Tehreek-e-Insaf. He raised a question in a standing committee on Interior, followed by his statements and the Minister of Interior’s response. I would like you to give us the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ comment on the matter that his son went abroad and applied for asylum there, while traveling on a diplomatic passport. Such cases are not new. Firstly, please provide the ministry’s position on this particular case, and secondly, can we get some details about asylum cases—how many people leave from here and apply for asylum in this way, and what role does the Ministry of Foreign Affairs play in such matters?

Spokesperson:    I am not aware of this particular case. I can get the details from our relevant section. Perhaps you may also like to refer to the Ministry of Interior as well.

(Shaukat Piracha, AAJ News):    Excellency, there has been a series of statements from India urging their own government to open the window of dialogue with Pakistan and in that series, it was Shashi Tharoor in the beginning, then their army chief, and then SK Dulat last night, the former RAW chief, and especially the Secretary General of RSS, which is basically the extremist organization. The Secretary General has also advocated that there should be a dialogue with Pakistan and the opening of the sports relation etc. etc. So, my question is whether Pakistan will welcome such change of mind from Indian side, and secondly, if it really is the change of mind, why so?

(Waseem Abbasi, Arab News):    There have been reports in Indian media that there are back-channel talks going on between Pakistan and India. So, in supplementary to what Mr. Paracha said, what can you lend credence to these reports? Are these reports correct, and what is Pakistan's point of view on that?    

Spokesperson:    The voices within India calling for dialogue are obviously a positive development, we hope that sanity will prevail in India, and warmongering, the belligerence that has been emanating for the past several months and even beyond, for past years will fade away and pave the way for more such voices. We, of course, will see if there is an official reaction to those voices in India. 

About track two or back channel – well I am not aware of that and do not wish to comment on those. If I was to comment there would be no back channel. Back channel or track II, the name is self-explanatory. 

(Khalid Mehmood, Express News):    Sir, Donald Trump is currently on a visit to China. How do you view this visit in the context of the Iran–America conflict? Secondly, right after this, the Prime Minister of Pakistan is also scheduled to visit China. How do you see that visit, and what is its schedule?

Spokesperson:    The visit of President Donald Trump to China is extremely important. Pakistan, like other countries will keenly follow deliberations between the United States and China. We are supportive of their engagement, dialogue and cooperation on all global matters. This visit is welcome. We wish the two sides very productive deliberations. 

As regard, the visit of the Prime Minister, we will announce the dates when it is finalized. Pakistan’s engagement with China at the highest level, at the political level, continues. I mentioned about the telephone call of the Foreign Ministers held three days ago. So, our engagement with China at the political, leadership-level continues.

(Raziq Mehmood Bhatti, Kashmir Express):    Spokesperson, in Kashtwar, a school teacher along with two other individuals who are Kashmiris have been arrested, and they are being labeled as terrorists. The treatment they are receiving from the Indian army is said to be even worse than that of the Israeli forces.

Secondly, Prateek Sharma has been making consecutive visits across the control lines—so is there any indication that there is some kind of aggressive activity resulting from his visits?

And thirdly, a few days ago, according to media reports, three people were arrested in our area Neelum and in two other sectors. So, do they really have any connection with RAW, or what has been revealed about their identity?

Spokesperson:    The first two aspects of your question, the incident in Kashtwar and the visits to the Line of Control – these represent the two important dimensions of Jammu and Kashmir dispute: One is the human rights dimension, and the other is the peace and security dimension.

Regarding this incident in Kashtwar and similar other cases of the incidents of imprisonment, house demolitions, imprisonment without trial, torture, these actions by India in the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir have continued and relevant international human rights organization and UN Human Rights machinery are cognizant of these developments. Pakistan on its part, continue to raise its voice on these developments. 

As regards the LOC visits: the Pakistani troops on our side of the Line of Control, remain vigilant for any misadventure, any firing, any violation of the cease fire. So, our vigilance on Line of Control continues. This represents the peace and security side of the Jammu and Kashmir conflict. On all these aspects human rights, peace and security, Pakistan remained seized of this situation. 

As regards the arrest in Neelum Valley, I do not have the detail. I can check the details and get back.

(Zeeshan Yousafzai, Dunya News):    You have talked about the CBS News story, but we have seen the US senators, and they are discussing it while questioning Pakistan role as a mediator, particularly regarding the Iranian Jets presence in Pakistan. So, what are your response to them and those elements? Number first, number Second, there is currently ceasefire between US and Iran and Pakistan played role in it, but we have seen, reportedly, some limited attacks from both sides. So how do you define the ceasefire? Is it a fragile ceasefire, or what? And in Afghanistan I have lost afterwards.

Spokesperson:    First of all, on the statements by the US Senators and lawmakers. I think you are referring to the statement by Senator Lindsay Graham. I understand that this statement, was made immediately after the CBS News and before our press release. There was a gap of a few hours between the CBS News and our press release. Our press release has amply clarified the situation, and since then, we have not heard such voices. We explained that this aircraft was there for logistical, administrative and diplomatic reason, and it has nothing to do with the military purpose.

As regards the ceasefire, I would not ascribe any adjective to what the ceasefire is. It is welcoming and gratifying that the ceasefire is holding. We hope that it would continue to pave the way for dialogue and diplomacy and eventual settlement, and sustainable solution to this crisis.

(Mateen Haider, WE News):    Mr. Spokesperson, although you spoke about Lindsay Graham, but on the other side, the war Secretary kept on insisting that peace process is in progress. So, there have been exchange of proposals between US and Iran via Pakistan. So please share with us where this peace process stands right now? Still, there are hopes and optimism that the second round of talks may take place? and once Iranian and Americans agree to the peace proposal they have exchanged through Pakistan.

(Asghar Ali Mubarak, The Daily Mail International): During the ceremony of the Marka-e-Haq, the Prime Minister confirmed that the Iranian proposals has been received in Pakistan through the Field Marshal. So, has it been further processed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or by the Government of Pakistan?

Spokesperson:    Mr. Mateen Haider you asked about the peace process, and you use the word, “holding on”. Yes, the peace process is intact, it's holding on. We remain engaged. We remain hopeful. Injecting momentum into the peace process is primarily the prerogative of the two principal interlocutors. Pakistan, on its parts, remain engaged. 

Coming to the second question, yes, the Prime Minister confirmed it, and the message was swiftly relayed to the other side.

(Muhammad Anas Ahsan Mallick, Asia One News):    Three questions. Sorry, two of them are UAE, and one is on Iran. So, since you in your opening statement, you mentioned the telephone call between the Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister with the Singapore counterpart. And the same was discussed during a meeting with regards to the matter of the 20 Iranian seafarers and 11 Pakistanis as well? He tweeted about it as well, and subsequently it was mentioned in the meeting between US Charge d’ Affaires (Cd’A) and the Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister, as per a statement from your office. Can you provide us an update on those 20 Iranian seafarers and 11 Pakistanis? 

Have they been handed over to the Pakistan side in Singapore? Are they being brought to Pakistan? And if so, when, where? How? Number one, number two, the Indian Prime Minister is set to travel to the UAE, and there are reports that they will be finalizing a strategic defense partnership with the UAE, a fellow Gulf state. Does Pakistan intend to upgrade its existing defense pact with Saudi Arabia, beyond the current deployment of jets in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to a formal treaty based strategic mutual defense agreement with joint command structures, perhaps? And lastly, Middle East eye a prominent publication has today said, and I quote, that close to 15,000 people from Pakistan, have either been deported or denied re-entry in the UAE in recent months, predominantly, these were Shiites who belonged from Pakistan. Your comments on it?

Spokesperson:    Firstly, on the seafarers, the status as of now – I will have to check. I am afraid I do not have the details. 

About the defense agreement (with Gulf States): First of all, let me clarify that Pakistan's defense relations are not driven by one time visit of our neighboring country to any other place. Our defense relations, as part of the wider bilateral political diplomatic relations have an impetus of their own, have a trajectory of their own, have a strength and an institutional spirit of their own. So, whatever we decide with respect to our defense relations with any of our brotherly countries in the Gulf and in the Middle East will be determined by its own factors, and not by any particular visit from our neighbor. 

As regards the deportations from the UAE, I am sure you must have followed the press release from the Ministry of Interior. I wish to reiterate what was stated. I think the figure that you mentioned seemed exaggerated. We gave a certain figure in the last press briefing also. If you look at the overall size of Pakistani diaspora, then I think it will give you a better idea of what this figure amounts to. I have nothing further to add with respect to this issue, except to reiterate what I said last week and what was in the Ministry of Interior's press release.

(Syeda Qurat-ul-Ain, Independent Urdu):    Adding to what Anas asked, I have two questions, A, if there is any update on the incident, involving Pakistanis in Somalia? and B, the defense minister, Khwaja Asif has recently said on Monday that there is a possibility that Turkiye and Qatar could join defense cooperation with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Do you want to say anything about it?

Spokesperson:    First on Somalia: This is a development which is being followed in the media. I have also spoken on record on this matter. In addition to what I said last week on this issue, I can update you that the individuals are still with the Somali pirates. Unfortunately, their release has not been secured as yet. A two-member team from Pakistan Embassy, Djibouti, which is accredited to Somalia, went to Mogadishu, I said in my last briefing that this team is about to go. So it traveled over the weekend, and it has held important meetings with the Somali Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Somali Ministry of Defense, with the Somali Naval Authorities, and maritime authorities. We were told nationals crew members, are safe and are being provided food. I understand that they are in harsh living conditions, but at least we were assured of their safety. Secondly, we were told that pirates are negotiating directly with the ship owner, who is constantly informing and communicating the negotiation details to the Somali government officials. We (our team) spoke with this official who is in touch with the ship owner. The dynamics of this incident of piracy is that the pirates, who are Somali nationals, do not negotiate with the governments of the captives. They negotiate only with the ship-owners. So, it's incorrect to say that Pakistan government can negotiate or will negotiate. 

Piracy has been a long-standing problem. There have been many instances of piracy. We feel for the safety of our people. We are very keen for their quick repatriation. We are in touch with the Somali authorities and we will continue to do so. I can assure you that this matter is high on our radar and agenda, in terms of our bilateral with Somalia, and is a pressing, emergent humanitarian imperative. 

Second question on Defense Minister’s statement: I have not seen the statement. I can tell you that Pakistan's defense relations with Qatar and Türkiye are very strong. As I said in my previous answer, these relations have impetus of their own, the institutional strength of their own, and we are following those defense relations in their own trajectories.

(Tahir Khan, NNI): My question would be in three parts: Chinese special envoy for Afghanistan. He was in Kabul two days ago, and he met the Taliban Foreign Minister, Muttaqi and statement issued after the meeting. So, the main focus was the Ürümqi talks between Pakistan and Afghanistan and both sides they were emphasizing that this process should continue. Some sources say that China is trying to hold a second meeting. So, do you have something about the second meeting? And one thing in the same meeting was Muttaqi was telling the Chinese envoy that his government has taken some measure, some steps. And the second thing is that the Pakistani ambassador in Moscow, he gave interview to TAS new agency, and I have seen that interview, and he was saying that there is a calm, tension has been reduced with Afghanistan so, if you have something about this that is he right to say this? And the last part of this question is there was the yesterday, DPM has a tweet, and he was saying that envoy conference will begin today, regional envoy conference, so, is Pakistan Ambassador to Afghanistan is attending? and will Afghanistan would be on the agenda? 

(Khawaja Hamza, Media Today):    Following the recent militant attacks in Balochistan and KPK, what diplomatic engagements are underway to counter alleged foreign support for terrorist group targeting Pakistan?

Spokesperson:    Firstly, on the Chinese visit and his meeting with the Afghan Foreign Minister, I don't know. I do not have a readout or exact detail. We have good cooperation with China. Probably, they may have briefed our side on this. I certainly do not have any visibility. 

Regarding the statement by our Ambassador in Moscow, I am not aware of that context or what. It is difficult for me to comment on that. 

As regards Envoys Conference, I do not think our Ambassador to Afghanistan is there. This is primarily from the Envoys from the Middle East. 

As regards the diplomatic efforts on terrorism, I think I responded to it last week also. You can follow my response of last week on how we are pursuing counter terrorism efforts diplomatically, through bilateral and multilateral channels. The only development this week, was after this terrible Bannu attack for which the Afghan CDA was called to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for a demarche.

(Saleh Zaafir, The News): Sir, Chinese spokesman the other day, told the media that Chinese Foreign Minister has asked Foreign Minister of Pakistan to step up the efforts for the mediation between Iran and the United States. I wish to know, do you have any fresh instruction or directive or trajectory indicated by Beijing on this question? 

Spokesperson: The two Foreign Ministers held extensive discussions on regional developments. I think this message that you refer to, perhaps there was some translation difference in the English and the Chinese version. The Foreign Minister of China was deeply appreciative and supportive of our mediation efforts, to which we are grateful. This was, in essence, what was discussed during the meeting. We share a common position with China. During the visit of our DPM/FM to China last month, we issued a very important joint statement carrying a five-point plan, which remain a priority. Their implementation was discussed. As I said in my opening statement, the meeting was held with traditional warmth and cordiality – that remains the spirit of our relationships and dialogue moving forward.

(Abbas Jafar, District News): Sir, I have two questions. Taiwan is a point of contention between China and the US. According to media reports, President Trump was asked thrice about Taiwan question but he did not answer the question. What is Pakistan’s latest position on Taiwan?

Secondly, BLA has been declared a terrorist group in Australia. What are your comments? 

Spokesperson: On Taiwan, Pakistan's position remains firm and steadfast. We consider Taiwan as an inalienable part of China. We believe in one China principle, and we believe Taiwan to be an essential part of China. There is absolutely no change in that position. 

We welcome the designation of BLA as a terrorist entity in Australia. This is a result of our own diplomatic engagements, and the fact that the terrorism committed by BLA is now very open with evidence all over – that is why countries are increasingly designating this terrorist outfit (BLA) as a terrorist entity within their domestic laws.

(Amna Ali, Daily Express): Sir, given the current scenario, how does Pakistan see its relationship with the United Arab Emirates, like most of Pakistanis have been deported? The reason why I am asking this question because there is a lot of debate on social media and mainstream media regarding UAE’s Indian centric or Israel centric policies. So how Pakistan does see this relationship?

Spokesperson: As I said, Pakistan – UAE relations are strong, brotherly, built on strong foundation. We have 2.2 million strong diaspora in UAE. We have traditionally been friendly, cooperative in all affairs. We have a trade close to US $ 8 billion. Similar amount in remittances is sent by Pakistani diaspora based in UAE. There is absolutely no question on any negative aspersions with respect to our relations. 

Pakistan's relations with the UAE are immune from any external relations that UAE may have. This is based on the confidence that we have in our relationship with the UAE. We are confident, and I believe that this sentiment is shared in Abu Dhabi as well.

(Ghazala Noreen, Suno News): Sir, Defence Minister stated that after China’s visit, President Trump can visit Pakistan. What are your comments on this. 

Secondly, did Pakistan share Iran peace points with the US?
 
Spokesperson: On President Trump’s visit to Pakistan, I have no information.

Regarding Iranian peace points, it has been shared (with the US).

(Yang Kai, Xinhua News Agency): I heard a question about Taiwan, and my question is also about Taiwan. The 79th World Health Assembly will open on May the 18th. On May the 11th, spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry stated that to uphold the one China principle, as well as the sanctity and authority of relevant UNGA and the WHA resolutions, China has decided not to approve the Taiwan region's participation in this year's WHA. Any attempt to play the Taiwan card for political manipulation in defiance for the one China principle is doomed to fail. What is Pakistan's comment? Thank you.

Spokesperson: As I stated, Pakistan's position on Taiwan is consistent. We believe that there is only one China in the world, and Taiwan is an integral and inalienable part of China. Pakistan remains firmly committed to one-China principle in our bilateral interactions, as well as upholding their principle at different multilateral forums, particularly at the United Nations, including in the World Health Assembly. We cooperate very closely at the World Health Assembly. Pakistan would firmly support the efforts of China not just in its national context, but also with respect to how this issue plays out in different multilateral forums, particularly the World Health Assembly that you refer to.

(Caroline Davies, BBC): I think last week, you referred to the peace process between the US and Iran, hoping that it was going to happen sooner rather than later. Obviously, since then, we have had a response from both sides. We seem to have moved further apart. Is your assessment that it is now later rather than sooner?

Spokesperson: Look, what had happened (the context) was that there was a proposal which was expected from Iran, and that was received during the course of last week, and swiftly communicated to the other side. We are not discouraged by the fact that an agreement has not been reached at the soonest. We remain engaged. We remain positive. I think this is the sentiment that any facilitator ought to carry towards undertaking such sensitive endeavor as to have this peace process move forward. We have to be positive. We have to remain engaged. We should not be discouraged by any delays if it is perceived anywhere. We should not be discouraged by such perceptions.

(Hunain Ameen, South Era Network): Sir, I was wondering if there is going to be any let up in our Afghan refugee policy, because UNHCR said we have raised this question with Pakistani authorities to facilitate Afghan and especially the asylum seekers. But on average, we are expelling or deporting and/or deporting 4000 Afghans on average. Is there going to be any let up and after any subversive activity across Pakistan, there is intensifying of raids, even in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa which says, clearly, they are not going to hold any rates against Afghans. What is our policy on that?

Spokesperson: I am not aware of any change in our Afghan refugee policy. As regards expulsion of Afghans, these are the undocumented people with not legal permit to stay in the country. And I think there is no change in that. This issue is not related to a particular incident. It is not intensified or slowed down because of one or other factor. This is a very legal issue. It is an issue that is treated in the legal paradigm, not in a political paradigm as you seem to have referred.

(Mohammed M.A. Elakkad, Sputnik): I have three questions regarding the Pakistan relations with Russia. Number one regarding the planned Pakistan Russia visa Facilitation Agreement. Can you please give us some details? When will it be signed?

Number two, regarding the plan to expand Russian oil imports? Can you please give us some details? The Ambassador of Pakistan and Russia stated that Pakistan will get some imports from oil from Russia.

Number three, regarding the visit of Prime Minister to Russia, is it confirmed that it will be in June, and what will be the main agenda of this visit?

Spokesperson: As regard the visa Facilitation Agreement, I am not aware of its status. I can check the detail and get back to you.

The Ambassador's comment on the import of oil – I believe, was a statement of sintent, and this is what is desired. At what stage is this import process, I think you will have to refer to the Petroleum or Energy Ministry.
 
The Prime Minister's visit to Russian Federation – we will let you know the dates as and when it is decided.

(Muneer Ahmed, Associated Press): Sir, the other day you mentioned you were referring to the clock that the needle on the clock has not stopped, so it is working. I hope the clock is functioning well. Sir, we are grateful to the Prime Minister who the other day, confirmed that Iranian proposals have arrived in Pakistan. And as you mentioned, those proposals were swiftly sent to the United States. What is the fate of those proposals? Have they sent any response to Pakistan, and if so, then did Pakistan give the US response to the United States? What is the status of the Iranian proposal? And is there any response from the US side? Can you please confirm it?

Spokesperson: Yes, the clock on diplomacy has not stopped. As I said to a previous question, that the peace process is working.
 
As regards the specific proposal I told you before, and I have said it now, we do not comment on the specifics or on the channels of communication. So, whilst we remain engaged, we do not comment on the specifics.

Thank you very much.